 |
 |
-
- I'd like
to see
editorial cartoons about ...
-
|
|
|
You might also be interested in Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons about: John Ashcroft, John Boehner, John Bolton, John Branch, John Edwards, John Kasich, John Kelly, John Kennedy, John Kerry, John McCain, naming and names, John Roberts, John Paul Stevens. View all subjects for Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons.
1. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-11-21 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-11-21 |
Image Number: |
180556 |
Caption: |
Wanted for testimony.
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-11-13 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-11-13 |
Image Number: |
180413 |
Caption: |
There are no bandages! There were no broken bones! There was no blood! There was no quid pro quo. Trump.
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-09-11 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-09-11 |
Image Number: |
179475 |
Caption: |
Another rat leaves the Trump administration. Blech.
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-07-31 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-07-31 |
Image Number: |
178855 |
Caption: |
John Delaney.
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-07-15 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-07-15 |
Image Number: |
178620 |
Caption: |
No caption (Politicians have holes instead of eyes as a member of Border Patrol talks to them).
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-06-26 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-06-26 |
Image Number: |
178313 |
Caption: |
See you in Miami for the Democratic debates. June 26 De Blasio Ryan Castro Booker Warren O'Rourke Klobuchar Gabbard Inslee Delaney. June 27 Williamson Hickenlooper Yang Buttigieg Biden Sanders Harris Gillibrand Bennet Swalwell.
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2019-02-22 |
Pub. Date: |
2019-02-22 |
Image Number: |
176520 |
Caption: |
The Vatican is holding a summit to discuss the problem of clerical sexual abuse. Leading bishops from around the world are attending the 4-day gathering. Expectations for concrete solutions are being downplayed by church officials and instead described as one phase in a long process. You'd think the Vatican would be further along at this point. In 2002, the Boston Globes investigative reporting exposed the Catholic archdiocese of Boston's patter of covering up sexual abuse of children by priests. Rather than report all these priests to the authorities, church leaders moved them to a different parish, even multiple times, when those priests sexually abused again. Church documents showed that the archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Bernard Law, had knowledge of many of these cases yet repeatedly said he didn't remember. I don't recall. Cardinal Law eventually resigned, but instead of ensuring Law faced legal action, Pope John Paul II gave him a position at the Vatican that included a large, comfortable apartment and, according to the N.Y. Times, A $12,000 monthly stipend. Cardinal Law died in 2017. It's long past time for reform from the Vatican.
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2018-12-14 |
Pub. Date: |
2018-12-14 |
Image Number: |
175512 |
Caption: |
I, Donald J Trump, do solemnly swear to con the American public, demean and debase the office of the President of the United States and continue to enrich myself and my family … so help me Republicans. The Art of the Deal.
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2018-09-10 |
Pub. Date: |
2002-01-28 |
Image Number: |
1661 |
Caption: |
(No caption.) A woman pushing a shopping cart wears a t-shirt that is imprinted with "Ask Not What You Can Do For Your Country, Shop". |
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2018-08-28 |
Pub. Date: |
2018-08-28 |
Image Number: |
173844 |
Caption: |
Hello? Hello?
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2018-05-02 |
Pub. Date: |
2018-05-02 |
Image Number: |
171226 |
Caption: |
This isn't some game. You are screwing with the work of the President of the United States. - John Dowd, Trump's former lead lawyer. $
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2017-10-22 |
Pub. Date: |
2017-10-22 |
Image Number: |
164193 |
Caption: |
Congresswoman Wilson is "all hat and not cattle." "Empty barrel." Raining rats and lap dogs.
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2017-10-20 |
Pub. Date: |
2017-10-20 |
Image Number: |
164179 |
Caption: |
When I was growing up "women were sacred." Pussy grabber.
|
|
|
|
|
14. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2017-10-12 |
Pub. Date: |
2017-10-12 |
Image Number: |
163758 |
Caption: |
Trump's Flavor of the Month.
|
|
|
|
|
15. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2016-03-29 |
Pub. Date: |
2016-03-29 |
Image Number: |
141413 |
Caption: |
Gov. John Kasich. (Live sketch from March 29, 2016 Townhall.) |
|
|
|
|
16. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2016-03-16 |
Pub. Date: |
2016-03-16 |
Image Number: |
140721 |
Caption: |
Trump loses Ohio to John Kasich. (Sketch inspired by the March 15, 2016 primary results.) |
|
|
|
|
17. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2016-03-04 |
Pub. Date: |
2016-03-04 |
Image Number: |
140353 |
Caption: |
"We need more tolerance." John Kasich. (Live sketch from March 3, 2016 Republican debate.) |
|
|
|
|
18. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2016-02-13 |
Pub. Date: |
2016-02-13 |
Image Number: |
139405 |
Caption: |
"We're fixing to lose the election to Hillary Clinton." - John Kasich. (Live sketch from February 13, 2016 Republican debate.) |
|
|
|
|
19. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2015-10-28 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-10-28 |
Image Number: |
134623 |
Caption: |
Trump taking on Kasich. (Sketch from the October 28, 2015 Republican Debate.) |
|
|
|
|
20. |
|
Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
Viewable Date: |
2015-06-29 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-29 |
Image Number: |
129201 |
Caption: |
Censored. Cite as: 576 U.S. - (2015). Scalia, J., dissenting. Every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in time since. They see what lesser legal minds - minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Olive Wendall Holmes, Hr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly - could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when is called for by their "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one mand and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution. The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to contain extravagances, even silly extravagances, of thought and expression; it is something else for the official opinion of the Court to do so. Of course the opinion's show profundities are often profoundly incoherent. "The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy and spirituality. (Really? Who ever thought that intimacy and spirituality [whatever that means] were freedoms? And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage. Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say.) Rights, we are told, can "rise ... from a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives define a liberty that remains urgent in our own era. (Huh? How can a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives [whatever that means] define [whatever that means] an urgent liberty [never mine], give birth to a right?) and we are told that, "[i]n any particular case," either the Equal Protection of Due Process Clause "may be thought to capture the essence of [a] right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, than the other, "even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right. (What say? What possible "essence" does substantive due process "capture" in an "accurate and comprehensive way"? It stands for nothing whatever, except those freedoms and entitlements that this Court really likes. And the Equal Protection Clause, as employed today, identifies nothing except a difference in treatment that this Court ... Obergfell v. Hodges. If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I never joined an opinion for the Court that began: "The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity." I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|